@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix schema: .
a schema:CreativeWork ;
dcterms:source ;
schema:about ,
,
;
schema:additionalProperty [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "02. Land management rights are in place and registered according to legal requirements." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk conclusion" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Non-negligible risk" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Other relevant information" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "N/A" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source workbook row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "3" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Geopolitical scale" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Brazil" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source type" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Native Forest-public, Native Forest-private, Native Forest-SLIMF , Forest Plantation-public, Forest Plantation-private, Forest Plantation-SLIMF" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk threshold" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "02. 1. Identified laws are not consistently upheld by all entities, are often ignored, are not enforced by relevant authorities, or any combination thereof;" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Description of risk" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "The primary risk associated with land management rights in Brazil stems from weak enforcement and high levels of corruption, which compromise sustainable practices on both public and private lands. Despite a structured concession process for public lands, issues like fraudulent licensing and illegal logging persist, often facilitated by public officials and companies issuing unauthorized permits. On private lands, compliance challenges arise from significant deficits in protected Legal Reserves and self-declared information in the Rural Environmental Registry, with most entries unverified by environmental authorities. These gaps in surveillance and enforcement, coupled with Brazil's high corruption perception, make land management rights a non-negligible risk across the country." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Type of verifier" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Document verification" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Mitigation requirement level" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Recommended" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Associated documents" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value """1. Temporary Occupation Authorization granted by INCRA;
2. Rural Environmental Registry - CAR
3. Rural Territorial Property Tax - ITR
4. Certificate of Rural Property Registration - CCIR
5. Certificate of Full Enrollment Rural Property Content
6. Negative Certificate of Debit of Rural Property - CNDIR
7. Operation license / Operation permission
8. Evidence of conflict over landowernisp
9. Ownership and Title Deeds""" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk mitigation measure" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value """Verify, through the review of the associated documents, that land ownership, possession, and usage rights are legitimate, valid, and free from unresolved conflicts.
For example:
a) Land ownership, possession, or use rights are supported by at least three documents listed in the associated documents;
b) Information such as owners’ names, property boundaries, and areas is cross-checked across multiple documents where available;
c) Permits and land-related authorizations are valid, unexpired, and any limitations or conditions are identified and assessed;
d) Relevant external sources (e.g. reports from the Pastoral Land Commission – CPT, the Indigenous Missionary Council – CIMI, or similar organizations) are reviewed to identify potential involvement of suppliers in land disputes;
e) Maps and spatial documents are reviewed to identify potential overlaps or conflicts with Indigenous lands, traditional communities, conservation units, or other legally protected areas, considering the scale of the operation and the local context.""" ] ;
schema:description "Verify, through the review of the associated documents, that land ownership, possession, and usage rights are legitimate, valid, and free from unresolved conflicts. For example: a) Land ownership, possession, or use rights are supported by at least three documents listed in the associated documents; b) Information such as owners’ names, property boundaries, and areas is cross-checked across multiple documents where available; c) Permits and land-related authorizations are valid, unexpired, and any limitations or conditions are identi…"@en,
"Contextgebonden FSC-mitigatiemaatregel uit FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 voor indicator 02. De volledige officiële Engelstalige maatregel, risicocontext, verifier en brondocumenten staan hieronder als brongebonden feiten."@nl ;
schema:identifier [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "02" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC Risk Mitigation row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 row 3" ] ;
schema:isPartOf ;
schema:keywords "Document verification",
"FSC",
"FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026",
"Risk Assessment",
"Risk Mitigation",
"indicator 02" ;
schema:mentions ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
;
schema:name "Brazil: FSC mitigation indicator 02 — row 3"@en,
"Brazilië: FSC-mitigatie indicator 02 — rij 3"@nl .