@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix schema: .
a schema:CreativeWork ;
dcterms:source ;
schema:about ,
,
;
schema:additionalProperty [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "13. Legal requirements for management activities and related operational requirements are complied with." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk conclusion" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Non-negligible risk" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Other relevant information" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Documentation review ensures the CAR is legally valid by reviewing its status on the official website of the relevant authorities. Field verification validate the authenticity and accuracy of the reviewed documentation and the conformity of operations with the applicable environmental legislation. Field verification also determine if harvesting activities don't threat conservation and preservation areas required by the law (APP and RL)." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source workbook row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "9" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Geopolitical scale" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Brazil" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source type" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Native Forest-public, Native Forest-private, Native Forest-SLIMF" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk threshold" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "13. 1. Identified laws are not consistently upheld by all entities, are often ignored, are not enforced by relevant authorities, or any combination thereof;" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Description of risk" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Sustainable forest management faces key risks including illegal deforestation, weak enforcement in remote areas, and insufficient technical training and infrastructure. Complex regulations, policy instability, and inadequate economic incentives further discourage compliance. Competition from cheaper illegal timber undermines sustainable markets, while corruption and limited inspection capacity hinder oversight. Audits uncover repeated non-conformities, including inadequate infrastructure maintenance and outdated asset inventories, hindering efforts to meet environmental and legal standards." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Type of verifier" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Others" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Mitigation requirement level" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Recommended" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Associated documents" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value """1. Forest Management Plan (PMFS) and the corresponding Annual Operating Plan (POA)
2. Operating permit
3. CAR - Rural Environmental Record
4. Embargo - Actual situation in IBAMA for Environmental fines and Embargo""" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk mitigation measure" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value """Verify, through review of associated documents and records and field inspections, that documentation related to management and operational activities complies with applicable environmental legislation and is valid, accurate, and reflective of on-the-ground operations.
For example:
1. Documentation Review
a) GIS analysis using up-to-date satellite imagery and accurate spatial data identifies potential deforestation or degradation within APPs and RLs;
b) GIS results correspond with information recorded in the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), Forest Management Plan (PMFS), and Annual Operating Plan (POA);
c) APP and RL boundaries declared in the CAR, PMFS, and POA are consistent and reflect legally established protection areas;
d) Public records from IBAMA and/or state environmental agencies do not indicate embargoes, fines, or sanctions related to illegal harvesting or forest transport activities.
2. Field Verification
a) Field observations confirm that forest management activities comply with legal restrictions applicable to APPs and RLs;
b) Harvest of exotic species within APPs, where applicable, complies with the conditions of the relevant authorization;
c) Soil conservation, road construction, and erosion control practices align with applicable legal requirements;
d) Remaining native vegetation and water resources do not show evidence of damage inconsistent with legal requirements;
e) Where GIS analysis is inconclusive, APPs and RLs declared in the CAR, PMFS, and POA accurately reflect on-the-ground conditions and meet applicable legal requirements.""" ] ;
schema:description "Verify, through review of associated documents and records and field inspections, that documentation related to management and operational activities complies with applicable environmental legislation and is valid, accurate, and reflective of on-the-ground operations. For example: 1."@en,
"Contextgebonden FSC-mitigatiemaatregel uit FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 voor indicator 13. De volledige officiële Engelstalige maatregel, risicocontext, verifier en brondocumenten staan hieronder als brongebonden feiten."@nl ;
schema:identifier [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "13" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC Risk Mitigation row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 row 9" ] ;
schema:isPartOf ;
schema:keywords "FSC",
"FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026",
"Others",
"Risk Assessment",
"Risk Mitigation",
"indicator 13" ;
schema:mentions ,
,
,
,
;
schema:name "Brazil: FSC mitigation indicator 13 — row 9"@en,
"Brazilië: FSC-mitigatie indicator 13 — rij 9"@nl .