@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix schema: .
a schema:CreativeWork ;
dcterms:source ;
schema:about ,
,
;
schema:additionalProperty [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "43. The rights of Indigenous Peoples, including land tenure and management, are respected and upheld according to the principles of FPIC." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk conclusion" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Non-negligible risk" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Other relevant information" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "N/A" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source workbook row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "44" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Geopolitical scale" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Brazil" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Source type" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Native Forest-public, Native Forest-private, Native Forest-SLIMF , Forest Plantation-public, Forest Plantation-private, Forest Plantation-SLIMF" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk threshold" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "43. 1. The presence of Indigenous Peoples is confirmed or likely within the area under assessment. The applicable legislation for the area under assessment covers ILO provisions governing the identification and rights of Indigenous Peoples,[4] but the risk assessment for indicator 42 confirms a designation of ‘non-negligible risk’;" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Description of risk" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Brazil has formal laws protecting Indigenous lands and communities. However, enforcement of these laws is often inconsistent due to political, economic, and legal challenges. While Brazil is a signatory of ILO Convention 169, which emphasizes FPIC, its implementation has been inconsistent in the country." ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Type of verifier" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Others" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Mitigation requirement level" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Recommended" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Associated documents" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "Local Communities, Indigenous, and Traditional Lands" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "Risk mitigation measure" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value """Verify, through documentation review and stakeholder consultation, whether the supply unit is located within legally demarcated Indigenous lands and, where applicable, that the rights of Indigenous Peoples, including land tenure, management, and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), are respected and upheld.
For example:
1. Documentation review
a) Publicly available data from competent authorities, such as FUNAI, INCRA, and the Palmares Cultural Foundation, are reviewed to identify whether the supply unit is located within legally demarcated Indigenous lands;
b) Legal status of identified Indigenous territories, including demarcated, under-demarcation, or claimed areas, is verified;
c) Applicable legal requirements related to land tenure, land use, management rights, and FPIC are respected and upheld.
2. Stakeholder consultation
a) Where the supply unit is located within legally demarcated Indigenous lands, competent authorities, such as IBAMA and INCRA, are consulted to verify that management activities comply with applicable legal requirements, including environmental licensing and land tenure and management rights;
b) Where the supply unit is located within legally demarcated Indigenous lands and activities are in compliance with applicable law, Indigenous Peoples and competent authorities, such as FUNAI, INCRA, and the Palmares Cultural Foundation, are consulted to verify that Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is in place.""" ] ;
schema:description "Verify, through documentation review and stakeholder consultation, whether the supply unit is located within legally demarcated Indigenous lands and, where applicable, that the rights of Indigenous Peoples, including land tenure, management, and Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), are respected and upheld. For example: 1."@en,
"Contextgebonden FSC-mitigatiemaatregel uit FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 voor indicator 43. De volledige officiële Engelstalige maatregel, risicocontext, verifier en brondocumenten staan hieronder als brongebonden feiten."@nl ;
schema:identifier [ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC risk indicator" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "43" ],
[ a schema:PropertyValue ;
schema:propertyID "FSC Risk Mitigation row" ;
schema:url ;
schema:value "FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026 row 44" ] ;
schema:isPartOf ;
schema:keywords "FSC",
"FSC-RA-BRA-02-2026",
"Others",
"Risk Assessment",
"Risk Mitigation",
"indicator 43" ;
schema:mentions ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
;
schema:name "Brazil: FSC mitigation indicator 43 — row 44"@en,
"Brazilië: FSC-mitigatie indicator 43 — rij 44"@nl .